2027 Planning · Preliminary

REP Fitness · 2027 Media Mix

Recommended allocation of working media across awareness, community and performance
CTC · Aug 2026
Awareness
15%
from ~1% today
Community
10%
from low single digits
Performance
75%
from ~99%
On the denominator. REP's 2026 pillar slide maps marketing focus, and roughly 38 of the 90 Performance points aren't media at all. Email/CRM, on-site CRO, organic SEO, cart recovery and post-purchase are owned-channel and site functions. Measured on working media alone, awareness sits closer to 1% than 2%. That's a stronger version of the same argument, and worth standardising on so the number means one thing in every room.

Awareness

15%
Tactic% total
Partnerships & official designations (rights deals)5.5%
Upper-funnel brand campaign (always-on)5.5%
Upper-funnel moment & product campaigns3.0%
PR & media relations1.0%

Community

10%
Tactic% total
Athletes, ambassadors, influencers & seeding3.5%
Event activations & moment programming3.5%
YouTube long-form / always-on content1.5%
Organic social & boosting1.0%
Blog & editorial0.5%

Performance

75%
Channel% totalDirection
Paid Search: Non-Brand34%Hold dollars; share declines
Paid Social: Acquisition16%Grow
Amazon Ads13%Grow
Paid Search: Brand9%Trim; test decides
Microsoft / Bing2%Relaunch only behind a geo holdout
Paid Social: Returning1%Capped pilot
On Bing: the MMM couldn't read it, because spend was too low to move the model. So the 2% is reserved, not committed. If we relaunch, it runs as a geo holdout with a defined read date; if we don't, those dollars go to Google, Meta or the next best performance channel rather than sitting in an unmeasured line.
Principle 01 · Fund from growth

Performance dollars stay whole in absolute terms. The brand layer is funded by budget growth, not reallocation. Moment activation spends out of performance, not awareness, because a partnership without paid behind it doesn't convert.

Principle 02 · 60/40 is a direction

Not a 2027 target. Holding performance dollars whole while making performance 40% of the mix implies roughly doubling marketing as a share of revenue. Hitting it by cutting takes revenue out of the business in the year you're trying to grow it.

Definition · Where affiliate sits

Commission belongs outside the mix. It's paid on conversion, so it's a cost of sale rather than working media. Keep it as its own reported line. Flat-fee placements and comparison content are media: fund those from awareness. Affiliate currently appears in two pillars on REP's slide, which double-counts it.

Percentages of working media · apply to the total set by OP101 / 02
Ranked by expected impact

The Four Tactics

REP's own spend history can't value these, which is itself the finding. Below draws on CTC portfolio experience.
CTC · Aug 2026
The pattern behind all four

Attention is borrowed, not bought.

Across our portfolio, upper-funnel spend works when it attaches to enthusiasm that already exists, and underperforms when it tries to manufacture enthusiasm from scratch. That is the single best predictor of which of these four tactics returns. There are only two reliable ways to borrow it:

MECHANISM 01
Borrow the crowd

Show up where an enthusiastic audience is already assembled and already distributing. Example: a functional-fitness gear brand embedded at a major championship event. The crowd films, posts and shares, so the event supplies the distribution the brand would otherwise have to buy.

MECHANISM 02
Borrow the moment

Time a launch or positioning to peak public enthusiasm. Example: a beverage brand that became official partner of a national team ahead of a World Cup, launching an exclusive product into a rising national storyline rather than alongside it.

01

Partnerships / Influencers

Highest impact, but it's two different line items

Split the line. Macro partnerships (Cooper DeJean / Demi Bagby tier) buy reach and credibility, so judge them on awareness lift. Creator content buys ad efficiency, so judge it on paid performance.

Across our portfolio, follower count shows no reliable correlation with paid creative performance outside genuine macro tier, and only 3–5% of ads ever take meaningful spend. You win by testing volume, not by picking well upfront.

The bigger opportunity is rights deals, which is Mechanism 02 in practice. Our two strongest moment plays were both official designations at major properties. Structure: designation → exclusive product → dedicated landing page → launch event → full paid duplication on day one. Budget these as revenue events, not acquisition events. They convert existing demand hard and fast, but don't expect them to lower CAC.
02

Upper Funnel Brand Campaign

The one you can actually prove

Be sober on platform ROAS: our agency-wide analysis shows awareness Video campaigns produce almost no in-platform purchase ROAS. This is justified on lift rather than ROAS, and lift is measurable. We've recorded double-digit brand consideration lift via a formal Brand Lift Study.

Stack: Brand Lift Study (~10 days, $5K+), assisted conversions on a 30-day lookback, geo holdout for the clean causal read.

Two cautions. Don't move brand search bids during the test window. On a recent CTV launch that happened, and last-touch then credited brand while undercrediting CTV. Second, underfunding guarantees a null result, so plan on roughly 10% of media behind it.
03

Events

Undervalued, and this is Mechanism 01

The case isn't community. Events are where the crowd supplies the distribution, and they pay out twice: as a creative production engine, since one client's activation generated roughly 15 paid concepts from organic content, and as net-new category search demand, which major race series create at a high new-customer rate.

In fitness equipment, a direct competitor is already bidding into that demand. Available today, independent of any physical activation. Needs 4–6 events a year to read a pattern.

Constraint: event properties license very differently. REP's commercial account had to strip all CrossFit references from PMax this month, resetting the campaign into learning. Note that this limits trademark use in ad copy, not presence at the event itself. Confirm what each property actually grants before budgeting.
04

PR

Weak standalone, strong as an amplifier

PR is where the borrowed-attention rule bites hardest. Nothing in our portfolio shows needle-moving results from traditional media placement on its own. Every PR-adjacent win we can point to rode one of the two mechanisms above: a crowd that was already assembled, or a moment already peaking.

Both of the examples above were sold internally as PR wins. Neither was earned media. One was an event presence; the other a rights designation with a product launch timed to a national storyline.

So don't fund PR as a standalone retainer. Fund it as the amplification layer attached to a designation or an event, where there is already a crowd or a moment to write about. Judge it on share of voice, never last-click.
What we still need
  • REP's directional 2027 budget from OP1. Everything here is percentage-based because we have no REP 2027 figure; dollar scenarios follow immediately once it exists.
  • John's Aug 10 full-funnel spend slide in a readable format, to reconcile against this view.
  • Clarification on "Retargeting & Audience Strategy": prospecting retargeting or returning customers? Each carries a different recommendation.
Tactic rankings reflect CTC portfolio experience and require validation by test02 / 02